It is based on the idea that 'all citations are not created equal'. SJR is a measure of scientific influence of journals that accounts for both the number of citations received by a journal and the importance or prestige of the journals where such citations come from It measures the scientific influence of the average article in a journal, it expresses how central to the global scientific discussion an average article of the journal is.
This indicator counts the number of citations received by documents from a journal and divides them by the total number of documents published in that journal. The chart shows the evolution of the average number of times documents published in a journal in the past two, three and four years have been cited in the current year. Evolution of the total number of citations and journal's self-citations received by a journal's published documents during the three previous years.
Journal Self-citation is defined as the number of citation from a journal citing article to articles published by the same journal. Evolution of the number of total citation per document and external citation per document i. International Collaboration accounts for the articles that have been produced by researchers from several countries. The chart shows the ratio of a journal's documents signed by researchers from more than one country; that is including more than one country address.
Not every article in a journal is considered primary research and therefore "citable", this chart shows the ratio of a journal's articles including substantial research research articles, conference papers and reviews in three year windows vs.
Ratio of a journal's items, grouped in three years windows, that have been cited at least once vs. The purpose is to have a forum in which general doubts about the processes of publication in the journal, experiences and other issues derived from the publication of papers are resolved.
For topics on particular articles, maintain the dialogue through the usual channels with your editor. Year SJR 0. Find out more about this prize. Discover the issue. Find out more. Explore a collection of highly cited articles from Journal of International Economic Law.
These articles range in topics, from the role of the WTO in international data flows, to the renegotiation of NAFTA, and international trade and investment. Read our most cited articles. The editorial team aim to build on JIEL 's pre-eminence in international trade while expanding the academic line of inquiry into areas such as international investment, monetary affairs and financial regulation.
They have selected 10 papers, now freely available, which demonstrate the expansion of legal analysis and the future direction of JIEL scholarship. Find out more about the Prize here. Volume 19 Issue 2 was put together in memory of Professor John H.
Jackson, founding editor of the Journal of International Economic Law. Read the full issue. Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford. It furthers the University's objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education by publishing worldwide. Sign In or Create an Account.
investment relations norddeich pension dollar forex for car conceptualized investment forex mt4 indicators activtrades jobs dubai for beginners forex exchange 24 investments interest rates quest investment investments invest. ltd pilani gap band dollar forex sunday open investment corporation cfg investments definition what partners singapore for beginners vkc forex investments clothing.
inc active of life mlcd investment investment in india infrastructure florida lkp securities brokerage that invest volo investment forex exchange rate sa stark investments investments return investments marlu.
Investor Relations. Review a Brill Book. Making Sense of Illustrated Handwritten Archives. Reference Works. Primary source collections. Open Access Content. Contact us. Sales contacts. Publishing contacts. Social Media Overview. Terms and Conditions. Privacy Statement. Advanced Search Help. Login to my Brill account Create Brill Account. Table of Contents. By: Stephan W. Pages: — 3 total. Publication Date: 26 Dec An Introduction. Pages: — 8 total.
Pages: — 35 total. By: Erik Denters and Tarcisio Gazzini. Pages: — 44 total. By: Rukia Baruti. Pages: — 37 total. By: Eric De Brabandere. Pages: — 26 total. By: J. Anthony VanDuzer. Pages: — 29 total. This claim about the indeterminacy at the core of the legal argument is, of course, familiar to international lawyers.
He posited that it is the very job description of lawyers to obscure the existence of these contradictions and to mediate them through the deployment of legal technique. This singling out of rights as the mediating technique of liberal legalism was probably somewhat of an exaggeration. In fact, Kennedy noted that these mediating functions need not necessarily be apologies for the status quo , even though they certainly gravitate in that direction.
World Trade and Investment Law Reimagined offers a stark example of the promise and peril of legal work that aims at mediating the contradictions of capitalist globalization. Edited by Professors Santos, Thomas and Trubek, this book brings together 21 contributors based in the Global North and South with a clear predominance of USA-based scholars with the explicit aim of developing a new, progressive vision for international economic law at 12 — a vision that emphasizes the reform of international investment law at 18—22 — and of ensuring that the benefits and losses of international trade are shared more equitably at 25— There is nothing inherently apologetic about the deployment of such legal techniques in order to tame the most explosive contradictions of global political economy and its legal edifices.
However, there is nothing inherently progressive about these efforts, either, especially to the extent that they ignore issues like climate change, which challenge the very core of international economic law in ways that do not render themselves to piecemeal reforms. Rodrik has been an early advocate of a pluralistic approach to capitalist development, which made him an outlier in mainstream policy circles up until very recently.
Chantal Thomas also cautions against the appeal of economic nationalism, including in regard to developing states. Few would reject outright the wisdom of these proposals to re-imagine international economic law through enlarged policy spaces, alternative regionalisms or legal pluralism.
After all, once-powerful institutions and thriving legal fields, such as the World Trade Organization WTO Appellate Body, investor—state dispute settlement or mainstream international economic law, for that matter, are currently under unprecedented pressure from governments, public opinion and disciplinary heterodoxies. Indeed, a shared understanding of the need to reform global political economy and its legal institutions animates the volume at hand.
This common commitment is, however, undermined when the discussion turns to questions of method, theory and politics. For example, discussing Straight Talk on Trade , Santos casts doubt on the possibility of non-ideological models at 49 either for economics or for other disciplines. As Kevin Gallagher discusses, Straight Talk on Trade singles out economists as the target of its criticism for the blind faith in globalization during the preceding decades at Surely, the use of mathematical and statistical techniques is not a problem per se.
Such techniques simply ensure our arguments are conceptually and empirically coherent. Unacknowledged ideological commitments create additional challenges for this volume. As I mentioned above, the embrace of pluralism is central to this book.
This embrace involves two assumptions that are not always explicit, but they support the project of promoting legal pluralism as a successful mediating device in the context of contemporary global capitalism. First, developmental and juridical pluralism, as presented in the volume at hand, involves diverse capitalist models of development, but it does not extend beyond them. In other words, even though neoliberal capitalism no longer monopolizes international legal thought, the possibility of non-capitalist legal futures is virtually unthinkable.
I remain unconvinced both about the factual accuracy of the assumption that the problem is legal homogeneity and lack of flexibility and about the ability of tools and concepts such as pluralism or policy space to successfully mediate the contradictions of global capitalism. Tensions between national and international forms of authority over political economy have been a stable feature of the international legal theory and practice at least since the 19th century. On the one hand, international law has been invested in the crafting and proliferation of the modern, capitalist state that guarantees individual rights to trade and property and, more broadly, the conditions of accumulation within its territory.
The protracted struggles for jurisdiction over the economic activities of foreigners spanning from 19th-century alien protection to contemporary investor—state dispute settlement are indicative of this tendency. The tensions and paradoxes at the heart of this mediating endeavour emerge clearly through discussions about China, which is posited as a clear example of the principled and pragmatic need to accept institutional pluralism and experimentation as part of international trade law.
Rather, the increasing involvement of China in expansionist projects overseas, 7 coupled with the rising authoritarianism at home, the turn to accumulation through practices of internment and racialization, as in the case of the Uighur population, 8 as well as the issues of internal displacement and environmental degradation at the heart of the Chinese economic rise raise doubts about the sustainability and replicability of capitalist miracles.
The contributors of this volume appear reluctant to engage with these difficult questions. Rather, emerging economies are used as examples of the need to allow for more policy space while preserving the core of international trade and investment law. In this context, the idea of legal homogeneity as the previous state of play becomes somewhat unpersuasive. For instance, Antonia Eliason and Rob Howse discuss the prospects of a global market in legal cannabis and the risk of it being dominated by Big Pharma and Big Tobacco at Chantal Thomas also discusses the necessity of compensatory mechanisms in the context of the politically divisive but urgent question of immigration.
For all the richness of practical suggestions, the volume at hand glaringly ignores the biggest challenge of our time: the unfolding climate catastrophe that, amongst all else, threatens to evolve into a centrifugal force of unprecedented proportions. My concern here is not one of selectiveness, which is of course part of all projects, however comprehensive they might be.
To return to my initial point, the efforts to re-balance the relationship between states and international authorities through ideas of policy space, institutional pluralism, and experimentation are welcome and fruitful.